What Is HDSLR Good For?
I won’t spend too much time writing about HDSLR on this site, but I am interested in finding out what they’re good for. Unlike others, I am a bit skeptical to the current generation, and after testing them on a few projects, I am still convinced that this is nowhere near what you would expect from a professional digital motion picture camera. However, it is a very affordable tool with a specific aesthetic (due to sensor size) that few other solutions in the same price range can offer. This is my take on the format and how to avoid the biggest issues associated with it.
The above video is a really quick no-budget spot I shot for a friend who did scenography on the play. It was captured on the 5D, and has a few problems, but none of them are related to the capture device
(thanks to peirik for lending me the camera for the day). This was the kind of project that showed up just a few days before, and without an HDSLR probably wouldn’t have happened. No time, no budget, no crew. Just a few hours with the actors inside the set with a lamp. And that is a valid point for the HDSLR’s, they enable some projects to happen that otherwise wouldn’t.
This summer I’m employing a Canon 7D in two other specific situations where I think it can prove to be useful. I lighted an instructional video for home baristas in June, where I shot b-camera details and closeups with a Canon 7D (Panasonic HPX3000 was a-camera, and responsible for the main bulk of footage), and in the end of July I will be shooting a documentary for an extreme sports contest with Canon 7D and a few other light cameras. Keep in mind that both these projects are on a very tight budget, which is why we’re considering HDSLR in the first place.
Issue number 1

In the first scenario, the 7D offered a cheap way of getting bonus shots and cutaways on a project that was quite pressed for time. The shots were mainly close details with a lot of defocused image space, allowing the camera and the codec to focus it’s attention on capturing detail in the in-focus areas. Which brings us to issue number one with these cameras. They are in no way actual 1080p resolution, they process the line-skipping signal from the large sensors in a very smart way to recreate 1920 by 1080 pixels of imagery, but under the right circumstances they will fall apart. Actual resolution according to science is somewhere between standard definition and 720p, but in real life you’ll sometimes get the appearance of HD. The question is, does your project actually need 1080p? This project was going online and onto DVD’s, and we could happily live with the lower resolution. But try to stay away from very detailed images, or you will be disappointed.
Issue number 2
In the second scenario, I am heading off the road for some documentary shooting. The prospect of running through forests and up mountains with a heavy broadcast camera is not very appealing to me, and the size of the 7D will allow me to put it in places I otherwise wouldn’t be able to capture images. But the heavy focus on action sequences means we’ll need a good way to operate the camera handheld, and some remedy for the bad rolling shutter problems: issue number two.

A lot of the jelloish pictures you’ve seen on the net are caused by the small size of these cameras. Anthony Dod Mantle, cinematographer on Slumdog Millionaire, had similar problems when handholding the tiny SI2k. It actually needs more weight. With a support system, mattebox and follow focus, a lot of the tiny vibrations go away. I have also found that having an HDSLR viewfinder (mine is an LCDVF) is essential, as your head pressed towards the back of the camera will stabilize it a lot. Rolling shutter from fast pans and movements should then be possible to partially correct in post, and partially just accept as a part of the package (WYGIWYPF — What You Get Is What You Paid For).

With this basic rig, you can do very versatile handheld operating, quickly moving around and getting into tight spots to capture images. You can also build on this rig, adding your favourite bells and whistles. Personally, I don’t really believe in the shoulder rigs offered by a wide range of accessory makers, but I haven’t really tried them either. The big problem for me with operating is when you put it on a tripod, as you can’t angle the viewfinder, and will have to resort to operating with a monitor.
Issue number 3
Issue number three is a crucial point for any scenario: exposing as close to the final look as possible. There is little to no room in your HDSLR footage to tweak exposure and/or colors in post, so you need to be spot on while shooting. Ideally you should have a monitor with a waveform or similar to control exposure, but an HDSLR viewfinder helps a lot with this as well, as you aren’t disturbed too much by light levels in your surroundings when looking at the screen. You might also want to setup your Canon with user settings that help take down contrast and sharpness (reducing some aliasing). I would hesitate (a LOT!) to bring this camera on any kind of VFX-shoot or wherever greenscreen is involved. Call me conservative. What you see on your screen is basically what you get, and for a 1500$ camera (plus about 8000$ of accessories), that’s not too bad.
And that’s about it for me. On the right project, it’s a viable, cheap solution to get the images you want. I can see these cameras on a lot of low budget music videos, feature film pilots, short films, student films, documentaries, commercials and the likes in the time ahead. But if budget will allow it, I’ll still be using proper tools for the job. I can also see both Panasonic and Sony (and then most likely Canon too) cooking up new prosumer videocameras with larger sensors to win back this market segment during the next year or so, while RED and Arri are rolling out a new generation of professional motion picture cameras to win back the industry. HDSLR might not be a revolution, but it’s certainly part of an ongoing reform.
Are you trying out HDSLR? Please feel free to share experiences and results you’ve attained in the comments. And remember, in the end it’s all about the final image — not about the equipment you used to create it. Just ask Stu Maschwitz.














RSS Feed
I’ve experienced people going “wow” from the film-like images and I’ve wasting entire days of shooting caused by moire. Shooting with video DSLR is very tempting, ’cause one really starts thinking “maaybe I get it right this time” since it is so cheap, easy and actually has lot of potential.
But I’m so tired of watching videos shot with DSLR’s where every single shot has some sort of defect, I’ve made up my mind. The conclusion is that it’s just another tool to use, with pro’s and con’s. The good thing is that it has really reminded me that you still need to know what you are doing to make good strong storytelling images, maybe now more then ever.
I aggree with Klüver and your thoughts Fredriksen. Ive used my 5d and the 7d on shorts, documentary and musicvideo and cant say im impressed with more than the DoF.
As you say, if the project needs shallow dof and doesnt have the cash to get the more expencive equipment, the HDSLRs can produce some pretty impressive images, but you have to work around the technical flaws and the physical imperements.
After the last music video i did, i told my producer that id never work on hdslr again if the project didnt absolutely need that format. As you say, its all about the final product, and the equipment used has such a great impact on the way the story is told.. so far, the HDSLR has proven to be a troublesome and imperfect tool in almost every way. Lets hope the next gen kicks the revolution in the ass, because this generation was a dud.
Lets just say, the right tool for the right job, and hope our directors and producers arent too tempted to save money on inferior equipment.
So the sentiment seems to be that HDSLR is an immature technology that suits low-budget film production just fine. And students. I guess that’s not too bad, considering the costs. I still wonder though, how a guy like Shane Hurlbut (who shot Terminator Salvation) can praise it so much. I’d like to see how much money he has to spend on post production to fix the images he is capturing. Not to mention how a cinema full of professionals could even compare these images to 35mm on the Zacuto shootout. I wasn’t there, but in my opinion, the lack of resolution and latitude is pretty obvious even without a side-by-side comparison. What am I missing?
I think everybody wants it to work so bad they fall for the temptation time after time. Because at first glance it seems to be the ultimate solution for indie filmmakers and actually every filmmaker.
These are difficult times when it comes to technology. If I were to choose right now what I would shoot my next film on I wouldn’t have a clue… The most promising thing for me so far is the Aaton Penelope Delta, but whatever, I still have my DVX100 and it’s totally awesome.
Are there anyone who knows about cheap shoulder-mount systems? RedRock Micro is so expensive!
This was a school-project, and I must say that having a Canon 7D was really good. Didn’t need extra light and didn’t need to capture the tape. So for, students like me, it’s a very nice tool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrvVPENXMEk
I guess we should also not forget the high-ISO capabilities for documentary shooting.
Simen: Have a look at the Jag35 Field Runner:
http://jag35.com/new/products/the-field-runner/
BTW Simen, as you are a student of cinematography, I would encourage you to practice using lights, even if the 7D can do without. The natural look is definitely right for some projects, and shooting with available light only takes practice to master, just don’t forget that lights are a big part of our visual language, and takes even longer to really understand.
Nice little chat at the end of this podcast about the Alexa with its rolling shutter. Oh man I hate rolling shutter!
The upcoming digimag for the Aaton Penelope is supposed to use a CCD sensor, which AFAIK use a global shutter to capture light, as opposed to the rolling shutter on CMOS-cameras. Release 2011 if anyone has the sense to get this camera to Norway
But then again, CCDs supposedly exhibit other artifacts that CMOS are immune to. Read here.